
My last blog was over 2,000 words.
Nobody read it.
I’ve learned my lesson…should have got Hilary Benn to narrate.

My last blog was over 2,000 words.
Nobody read it.
I’ve learned my lesson…should have got Hilary Benn to narrate.
As a gesture of seasonal good-will I’m making this specially written nativity play licence-free, should any schools wish to stage it as an alternative to the standard mangery affair.

SCENE 1: INTERIOR, PALACE OF CAESAR AUGUSTUS [You can recreate the opulence of classical Rome with a few rolls of gold wrapping paper and some tinsel. If you’ve got a couple of pasty kids who don’t like acting then make them togas from white sheets and have them in the background as statues]
EMPEROR AUGUSTUS LIES ON HIS CHAISE LONGUE [2 dinner tables pushed together with a rug over them] HIS TRUSTED ADVISOR, GASPAR, ENTERS
NARRATOR 1: Behold the mighty palace of Caesar Augustus, ruler of the Roman <mumble, mumble, cries>
GASPAR: Hail, Caesar!
AUGUSTUS: Hi, Gaspar. How’s it hanging?
GASPAR: You summoned me oh mighty Augustus, father of the Roman Empire, ruler of the world, god incarnate, champion of the people, bringer of prosperity, hero of the senate and founder of a nice hot month when all the kids are off school.
AUGUSTUS: Did I? <Pause> Ah, yes, I’m going to order a census of all the known world, for the purposes of taxation. As my wisest advisor could you sort of, you know, make that thing I just said happen?
GASPAR: This will be a mighty task, Caesar. This is the latest population estimate [Unrolls lengthy parchment with ‘MMMMMMMMMM…’ written on it. There should be about 56,800 Ms, but the audience probably won’t count, so don’t sweat it] Surely you don’t wish me to divert my efforts from my current task of finding a counting system which isn’t bloody stupid.
AUGUSTUS: With a stronger tax base you will have more funds for your mathematical nonsense, Gaspar, as sure as II + II = IV. Also this is 1 BC, next year we flip over to 1 AD, unless you come up with a well-defined concept of zero before New Year’s eve, and I think a big census is the sort of thing we should do to mark this historic calendar change.
GASPAR (sighing): Very well, Caesar. I shall organise census-takers to travel the length and breadth of Europe, North Africa and the Middle-East counting people, assessing the value of their properties, farms and simple iron-age businesses. You shall have your taxes, mighty Caesar!
AUGUSTUS: Actually, I’ve come up with a rather clever idea that may make this census a lot easier for you, dear Gaspar. What if we made the people travel?
GASPAR: Well, Caesar, my census takers will really need to see how much land they own, the size of their farms, the…
AUGUSTUS (Interrupting) : I haven’t told you the clever bit yet…what if we make them trace their male ancestry back 1,000 years and travel to the city that their family lived in then?
GASPAR: Wise Caesar, had you perhaps had a few wines when you came up with this plan? It would cause chaos across the whole Empire; millions of people displaced, a complete cessation of all economic activity, people being forced to travel thousands of miles and almost no records that would allow us or them to check they’d got it right. It’s possibly the worst way ever to organise a census!
AUGUSTUS: You’re pretty lippy given that I can have you torn apart by wild horses on a whim, and “due process” would just be checking that the ropes were tied tightly enough. Do you know something I don’t?
GASPAR: Well, sire, I’ve been meaning to bring this up for a while…but you died in 14BC. I really just keep popping in to humour you.
AUGUSTUS: Died? Surely not. King Herod was saying only yesterday how well I looked.
GASPAR: He’s not exactly impartial in this matter, Caesar – he died four years ago.
AUGUSTUS: Herod? Really? That’s terrible…the kids will be devastated.
GASPAR: Indeed they were.
AUGUSTUS: But my mind is made up. Organise my census and tell Governor Quirinius to really hammer those, um, “Zionists” in Judaea. I’m sick of them secretly controlling the world…that’s my job.
GASPAR: Yes, sire, just as soon as we appoint him – in 6 years’ time – I’ll tell him to get on the job.
AUGUSTUS: So I’m dead, Herod’s dead, Quirinius isn’t a governor yet and my plan’s crazy? This nativity thing is harder to organise than it sounds, isn’t it?
GASPAR: Quite so, Caesar, and I also plan to take a few months’ leave. I’ve been offered the opportunity to appear on “I’m a wise man, get me out of here” and I need to follow my star.
NARRATOR 2: And so it was that the Emperor Augustus ordered a census of all the known world, as told in the Gospel of Luke…other religions are also available.
[Children sing O’Little Town of Bethlehem while Curtis from year 3, who can bench-press 200lbs, but can’t be trusted to speak or sing, moves the scenery]
SCENE 2: INTERIOR OF JOSEPH AND MARY’S HOUSE IN NAZARETH [Wash the blood off year 2’s woodwork projects and sprinkle them round to show that Joseph is a carpenter]
NARRATOR 3: NAZARETH! <Faints>
JOSEPH (checking mail): Bill…bill…Ancient Carpenter Monthly…bill…letter from the Governor of Syria!
[Joseph opens and reads the letter]
JOSEPH: Gosh! According to this, Mary, the Governor of Syria has ordered us to travel to Bethlehem for a census. You’d better get your ass moving!
MARY: But Joseph, my sweet husband, we don’t live in Syria.
JOSEPH: Yeah, there’s small-print about this being a census of all the known world by some dead emperor.
MARY: But why must we travel all of the way to Bethlehem when I am so heavy with child?
JOSEPH: Because it is my ancestral city, Mary. For I am of the lineage of King David, unto whom God himself promised the land of Israel for all eternity.
MARY (crossly): Being of the line of King David doesn’t seem to do us any favours when we’re trying to scratch out a subsistence living as carpenters, does it…but when I need to trek 65 miles on a donkey with swollen ankles and piles like kippahs full of jam it’s a different story!
JOSEPH: I’m sorry, Mary, but even though you are heavily pregnant, and census-taking is against Jewish law and probably nobody would notice or care if we just didn’t bother, we must travel to Bethlehem immediately, for the Governor of a country we don’t live in has decreed it!
MARY (softly): This is about the angel again, isn’t it?
JOSEPH: NOBODY ELSE GETS PREGNANT BY ‘A MIRACLE’, MARY!
MARY: Why won’t you believe me, my beloved husband?
JOSEPH: Gosh, I don’t know. Why would you, a woman living in a society where the penalty for adultery is public stoning to death, lie to me, your betrothed, about how you’re pregnant without me getting a sniff, eh?
MARY: But, Joseph, did not my cousin, Elizabeth, become pregnant, even though her husband was too old and feeble for the marital act? Did she not give birth to John the Baptist?
JOSEPH: I think you may have misheard the ‘baptist’ bit, but…um…yeah, fair does; we’re both in the wrong. You shut up about Liz and I won’t mention the angel again.
MARY: We’ll be loving and trusting parents to our new child, Joseph. It will be wonderful.
JOSEPH: Right. Let’s get this Bethlehem thing done, and just hope that this is the last thing anybody ever says about this whole bloody affair.
NARRATOR 4: And so, for reasons best described as ‘wacky’, Joseph and Mary set off for Bethlehem.
[Children sing ‘Away in a manger’ while 4 teachers and a lunch-time supervisor try to get Curtis to stop throwing tables at the audience]
SCENE 3: EXTERIOR, NIGHT-TIME, BETHLEHEM [Which was built almost entirely of badly painted cardboard boxes]
MARY: This is hopeless, Joseph, we’re never going to find anywhere to stay. The town is flooded with travellers because tracing ancestry back 1,000 years has created an exponential growth in the number of people trying to get into major settlements of that period, and half the inn-keepers have buggered off somewhere else anyway, leaving no-one to run their hostelries.
JOSEPH: What are you talking about, woman? We could have had a room in that first place we tried.
MARY: Sure, the place with 1-star on Trip Advisor. Who the hell wants to give birth in a place that only gets one star?
JOSEPH (sighing): Right, I’ll ask someone…Excuse me, sir, do you know where we can find an inn with a room?
PASSER-BY: Sorry, mate, no good asking me. I’m a Gaul. I’m looking for a place myself.
JOSEPH: It’s a nightmare, isn’t it? The road from Nazareth was nose-to-tail; solid donkey as far as the eye could see.
PASSER-BY: You don’t have to tell me, pal – I came in on the Jerusalem road. Bloody dreadful it was. They’re only digging up half of it. Mile after mile with a 3mph speed limit.
JOSEPH: You used the Jerusalem road from Gaul? You must be crazy! What you should have done is follow the coast road down to Ashdod, then take a left and…
MARY: No hurry, Joe, but I am minutes away from delivering the son of God while sitting on a sodding donkey!
JOSEPH (to passer-by): Sorry, mate, better get going, but believe me, I’m as sick of this mass exodus of people from Syria as you are. It’s caused nothing but trouble for everybody.
PASSER-BY: Yeah. Still, at least they’re not bombing us, eh?
MARY: Look, Joseph! I think that inn up there is open!
JOSEPH: Right, come on, then.
NARRATOR 5: And so Joseph and Mary presented themselves at the ‘Britain First Western Hotel’ and knocked on the door.
[SFX: KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK]
[Door opens]
INN KEEPER: Whu?
JOSEPH: My wife and I have travelled many miles, she is heavy with child and we need rest and food.
INN KEEPER: You Muslins?
JOSEPH: Sorry?
INN KEEPER: You look a bit Muslinish, what with the head-dresses and everything.
JOSEPH: We are simple travellers, looking for shelter. Can you find it in your heart to help us?
INN KEEPER: Travellers? You look more like economic migrants to me. <Looks at Mary> Here for a spot of free healthcare are you?
JOSEPH: We just need a room, please.
INN KEEPER: And you think it’s OK to get a room ahead of the hundreds of Bethlehemish who need somewhere to stay, do you? We send millions of whatever currency we use to your country and you still come over here, demanding that we all become Muslins and trying to impose Syria law! It’s because of people like you that we’re not allowed to celebrate Christmas yet!
MARY: Please, kind skinhead, we’re only here for the census and I am desperately in need of somewhere to deliver my child. We shall be on our way by the morning, which is already nearly upon us.
INN KEEPER: You married? Proper married, not some civil partnership crap?
JOSEPH: Of course!
INN KEEP: OK then, but just because I’m a bit tanked up on sherry. You can have the manger round the back, but leave it tidy!
JOSEPH: Thank you, sir. A blessing upon your house and your poorly spelled tattoos.
INN KEEP: Make the most of it, mate. I’m voting for Pontius Pilate’s UKIP lot next year and they’re going to close the borders, I can tell you.
MARY (sotto voce): I’m only giving this place one star as well. Nobody’s ever going to come here again, I tell you!
NARRATOR 6: And so it was that Mary’s child was born in a lowly-rated cattle-shed.
MARY (holding baby Jesus): I shall call him Jesus!
JOSEPH: Whatever.
NARRATOR 7: Three shepherds came to visit
SHEPHERD 1: We followed a star to find this manger.
SHEPHERD 2: It was a nice break from our ‘Which mushroom tastes nicest’ test.
SHEPHERD 3: I can see the river of time carrying us all to the devouring frog at the end of eternity!
NARRATOR 7: And three wise men.
BALTHAZAR : I bring gold!
MELCHIOR: I bring frankincense!
GASPAR: I bring a growing dread this this is all somehow my fault.
NARRATOR 8: Christianity was born!
HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS, BISHOP OF THE HOLY SEE, VICAR OF CHRIST, HOLDER OF THE APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION, HEIR TO SAINT PETER’S THRONE, PRIMATE OF ROME, GOD’S REPRESENTATIVE ON EARTH AND LAIRD OF GLENCOE: You know this deal’s real ‘cos it has the Pope’s seal!
[The children, except for Curtis who is being tempted out the back-door by the caretaker armed with a protein shake on a stick, sing Ave Maria while parents check their phones and wonder if their ‘dentist appointment’ excuse is going to hold or if they’re going to have to stuff their cheeks with tissue to pull it off]
ALL CHILDREN: MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE! DON’T FORGET TO BUY OUR LOVE BY GIVING US STUFF!
—- THE END —-
Have you ever worked at a company that needs to make redundancies? I’d imagine that most people have, but just in case you haven’t here’s what happens.

An e-mail goes out to all of the staff. Obviously it varies from company to company, but all of the key phrases are in there…’wider economic problems’, ‘reduce costs to be more effective’, ‘poorer than expected Q4 performance’, etc. What’s always the same is the bit at the end of the e-mail, “Please reply to this mail letting us know your thoughts on who should be made redundant”. That’s your cue to give some serious consideration to the company structure; Dave in accounts seems like a fucking waste of space, whose main value is a sure win if you pick him in the Friday sickie sweepstake, but he also seems to be the only person you know who can make VLOOKUP work properly. These are weighty matters.
If you work in management things are even worse. This is a bit of a secret, so don’t tell anyone, but those at the very top of the company send a second e-mail to the management, telling them who they’re expected to vote for. These are always crouched in terms such as ‘suggestions’, ‘in no way mandatory’ and ‘absolutely not putting your dick on the chopping-block by naming anyone different’, but a good manager can read right between those lines. Not that knowing what’s expected lifts you off the horns of a dilemma. Susan from personnel is on the list, but if you vote for her she may well find out and un-friend you on Facebook, and that means no more bikini pictures of her in Magaluf every July. If you believe that you’re unlikely to get another promotion, or that the redundancies are to slim down the company to make it more attractive for a take-over then you might think it’s worth the risk of defying the boss and keeping your summer spot-the-nip-slip permissions safe.
Ultimately all of the votes from all of the staff who Susan remembered to include in the original e-mail and who could be bothered to fight their way through the crippling fear of job loss to actually reply are totted up and the list of those to go is published, accompanied by a vote tally, and the unlucky ‘winners’ get a short presentation, a cardboard box and 10 minutes to get the fuck out.

Just in case you’re believing all of this (in which case you’re either new here -and by ‘here’ I mean ‘on this planet’- or very, very drunk) it’s all gibberish. Redundancy is unpleasant for all concerned, the short- and long-term effects on the business must be considered, the whole issue is far too complicated and difficult to be thrown open to a public vote and left to come down to who can drive Excel formula or who posts hot Facebook pics.
And so it is with military action in Syria. For the people who’ve had security briefings, detailed analysis of the situation and projections of likely outcomes to e-mail 107,000 people and ask them to choose between #SoundsLikeAThingThatMightWork and #BombsAreNasty isn’t just pointless, it’s craven. It is the antithesis of proper leadership. Leaders are elected to lead, to make unpopular decisions when they have to, to weigh the options and arrive at a considered opinion.
I don’t mind that Corbyn is against bombing, I certainly don’t claim to have enough information to say that’s the wrong position. I doubt I could even spell the names of most of the groups fighting in the region. I do mind that Corbyn is using poorly informed public opinion both as a shield to avoid changing his own views and as a lever to crowbar other MPs into supporting him. He’s the company boss who can tell Dave from accounts that he always liked him and doesn’t want to see him leave, but that the staff have spoken rather than having to have the difficult ‘bad news about Christmas, Dave’ conversation.
Perhaps Jeremy needs to consider that if he wants to run a party or a country this way then it is the politicians themselves who are redundant.
There’s a kick-starter project that’s gaining some attention at the moment that plans to make a 14 hour long film of paint drying.
It’s here, if you really want to see.
Its purpose is to submit the film to the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), pay their fee and make them watch all 14 hours of it. Naturally it’s a protest against state censorship.
The problem is that the BBFC itself is a protest against state censorship.
When cinemas appeared as a form of entertainment they came into a legal vacuum. Local authorities had no control over them and no legislation existed to govern them. The law that prevented them from showing graphic sex and violence was, and remains, the Obscene Publications Act (OPA); cases around which tend to be long, expensive, and necessarily subjective.
Faced with the possibility of the UK government becoming directly involved in film censorship the industry itself created the BBFC, agreed to fund it through fees for having their films classified and charged it with ensuring that films shown in Britain remained on the right side of the OPA.
The BBFC has diligently maintained this duty for 103 years. Local authorities were given the power to licence cinemas and it is they, not the government, who insist that a condition of that licence is that films shown are BBFC certified. In practice the BBFC have done so well that local authorities rarely feel the need to do more than trust their judgement. It’s a big step forward from the early days of cinema, when police used fire safety laws to close them down by setting fire to their celluloid to see if was flammable. Until the Video Recordings Act of 1984, which stated that all video cassettes supplied in the UK must carry a BBFC rating, the BBFC had no legal authority at all. They still have no power to ban or censor films shown in private, members-only, cinemas.
Throughout its history the BBFC has sought to reflect public opinion and to change with the times. It has always followed the majority, progressive views of the population and not caved in to puritanical minority voices, no matter how loudly they’ve shouted.
If you want to pay them to watch a 14-hour long film of paint then that’s fine, but don’t think you’re making a point about the tyranny of a politician wielding scissors in the cutting room; they’ve been protecting us from that for more than a century.
Because I ride a motorbike to work every day and it blows off.
“Hey, George, me and Bri and Steve are starting a gang, do you want to join?”
“Brill, I hope we get to eat sweets, talk about bikes and agree that girls are ikky. Man, it sure is sweet being 10!”
“Welcome aboard. I’ve made this secret code so that we can send messages to each other and nobody else will be able to read them!”
“Uh-oh, we’ll have to give a copy of this to Mrs May at number 10.”
“Why? Who’s Mrs May?”
“Well, Harry, she’s the person that makes sure all of the kids in the street are safe from naughty children by reading all of their secret messages. Every gang that develops a code has to give her a copy of it. That way she can be sure that if she suspects somebody of planning to egg houses, or ring doorbells and run away, or even steal dust caps from cars she can set her dog, Bobby, on them.”
“I’m not sure I want Mrs May reading all of my messages, George. She’s an old busy-body with 8 cats!”
“This isn’t the time for ad hominem attacks, Harry. Mrs May has already prevented dozens of bad-boy attacks on this street, and this simple measure will allow her to prevent many more. What if Bad Ali’s gang were planning to look up girls’ skirts – you wouldn’t want that to happen, would you?”
“No…that does sound bad. Will she be spying on us all of the time?”
“She’s not spying, Harry, she’s keeping us safe and she’ll only read the messages if one of the judges from the flower and vegetable show says it’s OK. They’ve got our best interests at heart.”
“Doesn’t her friend Michael from the village council choose who’s going to judge the flower and vegetable show?”
“The important point is that she’s keeping us all safe. Don’t forget that. If we don’t let her have our secret code then somebody might even steal our bikes or discover our jazz mag stash in the woods.”
“Hang about, though – my code is based on a public-private key encryption method. If we hand it over to Mrs May then I can no longer use it to securely transfer passwords or financial information. I can’t even trust public-key encryption signatures. Our gang’s entire e-commerce model will be compromised and gangs from other streets will know that.”
“You’re being overly paranoid. Mrs May has no intention of damaging our on-line security and she’d never abuse this power in that way.”
“But what if some really bad boys broke into her house and wrote down all of the codes? They could intercept communications for years invisibly, harvesting a bank account and credit card information for everybody in the street and then clean out the lot, netting themselves billions…of, um, sweets. Cripes!”
“Aren’t you more worried that she might find out you’ve been looking at the underwear section of the Marks & Spencer web-site and tell your mum?”
“Well I certainly am now, George.”
“Best focus on that then, Harry. Now pop round to Mrs May’s house and leave these codes on her hall table – she usually leaves the door open. Just make sure no immigrants see you do it.”
[Author’s note: I’ve watched Star Trek, in all its various incarnations, since I was a kid. Over the years a few things have bothered me about the series. I imagine there was one meeting that explained everything…]
[SCENE: INTERIOR, STARFLEET MEETING ROOM, ARTIFICIALLY LIT AND CLINICALLY CLEAN. PRESENT IS DAVE OF AAA AARDVARK ACME STARSHIP DESIGN CONTRACTORS, DAVE HAS A THICK FOLDER OF PAPERS IN FRONT OF HIM]
[LT. COMMANDER ROBERT PRICE ENTERS AND SITS]
PRICE: Thank you for coming in, Dave.
DAVE: Aye, no bother, mate.
PRICE (Slightly uncomfortable): I wanted to talk about you some issues with the design for Enterprise D, but I want to stress that we’re generally very happy with it. These are just niggles, really.
DAVE: Whatever.
PRICE: The artificial gravity system, for example. Absolutely brilliant.
DAVE: Yeah, well that’s state of the art, mate. Dual units, each with its own primary, secondary and emergency power supplies. Lovely bit kit, but you don’t want to fuck around with your artificial gravity – ‘scuse my Klingon – causes bloody ‘avoc if it goes, that does.
PRICE: Yes, but…
DAVE: But then you sent that sarky memo, is what, mate.
PRICE: And that excuses the anti-matter containment unit, does it?
DAVE: Nowt wrong with that containment unit, pal. It’s built to Star Fleet rules and regs. You’ve got anti-matter you want containing, that’s the baby for you.
PRICE: Oh, I agree, the unit’s fine. Absolutely as it should be, but…well, some of the captains with space-experience are a little worried that it’s being run from a single domestic 13-amp plug.
DAVE: Nothing to worry about – as long as nobody unplugs it you’ll be sweet. Even if they do they’ll have 10 or 15 seconds to plug it back in. Totally idiot-proof.
PRICE: You don’t feel that failure of the anti-matter containment might also “cause havoc”.
DAVE: Well, yeah, but much more briefly and with less complaints afterwards. If you get my drift.
PRICE (Slightly angry): And is complaint avoidance why you’ve planned to have the warp-core ejector system wired into the same plug?
DAVE: No choice, mate. The unit has to be next to the warp core in order to eject it and what-not, and ‘ealth and safety won’t let us run an extension cable to another socket.
PRICE: There’s a feeling that you’ve designed a ship where the artificial gravity is bullet-proof and key engineering systems have massive single-points of failure to….well, to make a point.
DAVE (Pulling paper from his pile): If you send me a memo asking for “…immediate and detailed explanation of how costs have deviated so far from the initial budget” then you can only expect me to a cut a few corners to get it back under control, mate.
PRICE (irritated): Don’t you understand how annoying this is for us. How can costs even be a problem? We’re a post-money society.
DAVE: You and your poncy Starfleet pals might be post-money and happy to gad about the galaxy for the thrill of it, but the guy I’ve got coming in from Sector 731 to fit [Checks notes] 862 toilets…well, he’s not so keen on working for free for the greater good of society. You know what he’s chargin’ me for ’em? Only a night with my bloody wife, that’s what!
PRICE (incredulous): You bartered your wife to get the plumbing done?!
DAVE: And he was the lowest bidder! He was the only one prepared to do it for straight sex, no kissing.
PRICE: But…but…we use gold-pressed latinum for financial trades with developing worlds.
DAVE (sarcastic): Well blow me, I never thought of that. Jumped straight in with my wife’s honour as an opening bid I did. Whatever was I thinking of?
PRICE: …
DAVE: I offered ‘im gold-pressed latinum and he said (quotes from notes) “The value of latinum it is based entirely upon replicators being unable to produce it, which is clearly a ridiculous proposition when one is engineering at a molecular level. Nobody is trying to replicate it because doing so would render it worthless. It is, in effect, a position of artificial scarcity supporting an economy which only exists because of a technical oversight, and I find that a poor foundation on which to build my business.”
PRICE: I though you said he was a plumber from sector 700-and-something.
DAVE: ‘Ere, just because he doesn’t have a plummy sector-001 accent and does a job which you clearly think is beneath you doesn’t mean he’s not an educated bloke! Starship plumbing’s a highly specialised skill, mate. If you’re installing what is, ‘sentially, a very long tube with the infinite freezing vacuum of space at one end and your arse at the other you don’t it wired in by a bloke who signs ‘is name with an ‘X’.
PRICE: But, your wife…
DAVE: The deal’s done, pal, just let it drop, eh? One thing I will say is that this bloke’s work is fine, up to code and whatnot, but he’s not one for aesthetics, if you follow me. You don’t want to be showing them dunnies off to anyone. Strictly functional, like.
PRICE: The toilets won’t look nice?
DAVE: Hell, no. We’ll pick the best one and call that the Captain’s quarters, but he’ll want to keep that quiet or he’ll ‘ave an ‘ell of a wait every morning to make his log, if you know what I mean.
PRICE; Er…well, moving on.
DAVE: All I’m saying, pal, is that if you spent a little less time ravin’ about yer Engineering corp and a bit more time recruiting for the Star Fleet Plumbing corp you wouldn’t have these kind of issues.
PRICE: Yes. Now…
DAVE: Or perhaps you can find yer crew from a species what doesn’t have any arseholes. There must be some of them.
PRICE (firmly): Moving on…The captains are very happy with the ship’s defensive capabilities; virtually impenetrable shields, 400 photon torpedoes, 8 independently targeting banks of phasers, detachable saucer section with its own battle bridge. Impressive stuff.
DAVE: Oh yeah, mate, that’s all top-notch latest military stuff. Very nice it is.
PRICE: And, just to be clear, you did read the part of the project brief about this being a mission of peaceful exploration and discovery, didn’t you?
DAVE: Was that the bit about seeking out strange new worlds and civilisations?
PRICE: Yes.
DAVE: Oh yeah, I read that. Then I thought to myself, “You wouldn’t go to a strangers house without packing a few guns, would you?”, so I stuck on all them things you just said.
PRICE: It never occurred to you that turning up heavily armed at a new planet might not convince the inhabitants of our peaceful intentions?
DAVE: Nah, the way I see it sooner or later you’re going to fly up to some world where the Norvern ’emisphere ‘as been at war with the Souvern one for millennia, millions dead on both sides, a hundred generations of tit-fer-tat retaliations and what-not and if you turn up in star-ship with “Jesus wants me for a sunbeam” painted down the side they’re not going to pay much attention for you. But if ol’ Captain Trigger-Happy turns up and tells them they’ve got 45 minutes to bury the hatchet and get properly into the spirit of universal love or he’s going to start shooting at continents wot are looking at him funny they’re going to be the best of friends before you can say “orbital war-head dispenser”.
PRICE (shocked): That’s monstrous! Star Fleet doesn’t work like that!
DAVE: Whatever, mate, but you just look at ‘istory. The Middle East was trouble for years, then Professor Photon, or whoever, invented his torpedo and suddenly we had near-East, mysterious crater, far-East and a lot of people being very polite.
PRICE (even more shocked): That was a terrible act of terrorism! Star Fleet has a strict policy of non-intervention! It’s our Prime Directive.
DAVE (laughing): Yeah, right. Ooo, look, a new and unexplored world…let’s all beam down and ‘ave a look shall we? But, captain, what about the risk of contamination? Contami-what, science officer? Less chat, more beaming me down!
PRICE: Our transporter system removes alien organisms. That’s basic star-ship design, Dave. We expect you to know this sort of thing!
DAVE: Alien organisms aren’t your problem, pal. Basic biology is…every ‘uman is ‘ome to billions of micro-organisms and the transporter doesn’t remove them…I’m knowing this because transported people arrive alive and stay that way…unless they’re wearing a red jersey. So if you send them down to an alien world every time they breathe, sneeze, cough, blink, shake their head, fart or scratch their arse they’re showering the landscape with alien microbes. You might as well give them all smallpox-infected blankets and be done with it.
PRICE (uncertain): I’m…I’m sure it’s all taken care of.
DAVE (incredulous): Taken care of? You never wonder why the entire galaxy is basically populated by oxygen-breathing ‘umanoids roughly the same as us? It’s because ‘alf an hour after you lot have “discovered” a strange new world that’s all that can still survive there. Your ‘ole operation is shonky as ‘ell…new recruit, teach them navigation, tactics, engineering and orf they go. You lot just don’t see the detail. It’s the toilet thing all over again.
PRICE: We train our people to the highest standard!
DAVE; Yeah, right. [Mocking voice] “Are the inertial dampers on-line?”, “Yes, Captain”, “Excellent – accelerate us forward at 400,000,000g!”…”Captain, we’re going to crash into a planet at a few thousand miles an hour!”, “Oh no, the sudden massive deceleration will kill us! If only there were some way to dampen our inertia. Abandon ship!”
PRICE: We can crash ships into planets?
DAVE: Well it won’t do ’em much good, but we put the inertial dampers at the bum end for a reason, you know.
PRICE: Look..how about we just pretend this meeting never happened, eh?
DAVE: So the design’s signed off then?
PRICE: Well,,,unless there’s something you can do about the toilets.
DAVE: Are you married?
PRICE: No.
DAVE: Well, yer probably stuck with ’em, then. Just find someone expendable to boldly go where no man has gone before.
PRICE: Hey, that’s got a nice ring to it.
DAVE: Yeah, let’s ‘ope he still ‘as afterwards. See ya, mate. Cheers.
[DAVE RISES AND EXISTS ROOM. PRICE PUTS HIS HEAD IN HIS HANDS. SCENE ENDS]
Dear Car,
Recently you’ve started squeaking at me in a most unpleasant manner and I want to explain why this is unacceptable.
I want to make it clear I chose to have you. I live half a mile from a train station, or a gentle 10 mile cycle to work. If I’d chosen to walk or cycle every day then I’d look great in a bikini, and not like International Lard Ltd tried to hide a years’ worth of produce under three handkerchiefs.
In the time I’ve owned you I’ve met your demands; a new MOT here, a set of tyres there, insurance, your constant demand for petrol. Without all of these I’d be considerably financially better off. I’ve purchased the latest ‘must-have’ battery for you, spent hours unscrewing your oil warning light when it glows and topping you up with Lidl own brand oil…because I want the best for you.
What do I get in return? When I put dogs in the boot you don’t stop their hair getting everywhere. Both times I’ve hoovered you you’ve got covered in mud and Mars bar wrappers within weeks. I’ve nagged and nagged about the receding paint-line on your wheel arches, but if anything they’re rustier than ever. Why do you do this to me, you ungrateful piece of shit?
You don’t even have an iPhone connector! Tomorrow morning I’m going to have to manually set your clock to GMT! All the hours we’ve spent together on the road between home and work, home and dog-walking park, home and the supermarket that’s half a mile away and you can’t even learn when the bastard clocks go back!
Well, we’re done. I’m going to get a 4th-hand Porsche with an overly powerful engine and alloy wheels that haven’t been twatted off the sides of the single-track bridge in Prudhoe 500 times!
I know you can’t understand this, your early 21st Century engine-management computer is far too primitive, but I hope one day you get an AI upgrade that allows you to feel the shame a guilt that’s coming to you.
Love,
Your driver
Politics is a complex business, people say things, other people react to those things (often not in the way you’d expect a sane person to react) news outlets report these words and actions (usually in a way that happily coincides with the story they’ve been telling for years) and, somewhere down the line, millions of people draw little crosses and we all get to hate new people for 5 years.
Spreadsheets are often considered complex by those who are all too happy to publicly demonstrate their political ignorance, but are really much simpler. With a spreadsheet and your wits you can make data do what you want, it never throws a curve ball of pig’s head being bigger news than the rewriting of our human rights or the number of people below the poverty line.

Thanks to the nice people at the Electoral Commission you can combine politics and spreadsheets, because they let you download the voting data from general elections – for every constituency, for every candidate, you can see how many people voted for them (and how many people could have voted but didn’t).
With that data we can re-run the last election and assume everybody voted just the way they did last time!
Amazingly nothing changes – the Conservatives end up with a small but definite majority in the Commons and Labour fall 98 seats short of them.
Since the election though something has changed. Labour have elected Jeremy Corbyn as leader, with an unprecedented mandate to take the party to the left. The hope is that in 2020 his anti-austerity, socialist politics can take on and defeat the Tories. A gap of 98 seats is a lot to make up, so let’s start small…
To win one seat, specifically Gower in Wales, Corbyn needs 27 votes. That seems achievable. He could go there himself, talk nicely to people, promise he won’t have the royal family shot, offer them a lift to the polling station and so on. With his 27 new friends, and nothing else changing, Conservative and Labour would tie, in which case…I don’t know, perhaps they arm-wrestle or something (I did say politics was complex).
Unfortunately for Jeremy to win two seats he doesn’t just have to convince 54 people, he’s got to convince 68, but that’s still doable, even if the new 41 potential voters are across in Derby.
Then for the third seat he has to lay the charm offensive on another 165, and has to go to Croydon to do it.
By the time he’s won 10 seats he’s across in Cheshire and has given 4,411 people a lift and his personal assurance that the Queen’s life isn’t in danger.
You’re thinking that does sound so bad, but the next 10 seats mean coaxing an additional 20,820 voters into putting their cross next to Labour on the ballot paper, and even if the party buys Corbyn a minibus that’s still a lot of trips. Plus this is working with a static model. Nothing else is changing and we’re magicking these voters out of thin air.
Corbyn’s supporters say that he’s not going to compromise his principles to win over voters from UKIP and the Conservatives, and that his new brand of politics will tempt back those who abandoned the Labour party because it had become too centrist. In real terms this means there are exactly four groups of voters of any size from this year that Labour can now draw upon for electoral success:
From that list we can cross the SNP off straight away. The party is tied to the cause of Scottish Independence, and those who support that cause feel that Labour betrayed them. So three groups, then (I didn’t even need my spreadsheet to work that out).
The Lib Dems and the Greens between them total around 3.5m voters, so attracting them certainly seems easier than bombing round the country in a minibus and, thanks to the magic of spreadsheets, I can give some of them to Labour.
How many, though? Politically the Greens have a lot in common with JC, the Lib Dems not so much (and the Lib Dems are the larger block of voters, 2.4m to the Green’s 1.1m). Let’s be kind and say, across the board, one-quarter of all voters for these parties switch to Labour. This is a generous, and unlikely gift, but swelled by 900,000 new voters Labour would…
…take 7 new seats, and still be 86 seats behind the Conservatives.
How can this be, when just a few paragraphs ago I said that 4,411 people gave Labour 10 new seat? Well, inconveniently, the Green and Lib Dem voters don’t live in the right place. Take Clwyd, where Labour were only 237 votes from taking the seat in May; a quarter of the Lib Dem votes there yields a disappointing 229 people and the Greens didn’t field a candidate.
We need to also consider that Labour voters aren’t universally behind Mr Corbyn. Certainly a lot are happy to see the return of traditional Labour policies, but some also believe that centrist policies are the way to electoral victory, or just the way to run a country. Maybe they worry a little when nice Mr Cameron tells them that Labour are going to borrow their way into economic ruin, that we’ll be back to the Winter of Discontent and all of the other stuff he says.
The Telegraph trumpets that 37% of Labour voters won’t vote for Corbyn, but then that’s the sort of thing The Telegraph likes to say. Polls show Labour support holding fairly steady, but as the vote-share of the Lib Dems and especially the Greens is down that’s likely to be those disenfranchised ex-Labour supporters returning to the fold and back-filling those who are leaving. It would be reasonable to expect that to step up as a general election looms and people feel it’s a straight up-and-down choice between Corbyn or 5 more Tory years.
Let’s be generous again and say that, across the board 6% fewer people vote Labour than did in May, but leave the 25% of Lib Dems and Greens still moving behind Corbyn.
If 6% of May’s Labour voters (about 500,000 people) for 25% from those other parties (900,000 people) sounds like a good deal the numbers show that, compared to May, Labour would take 3 new seats…and lose 4, making them a nice round 100 seats behind the Conservatives in the Commons.
Bugger. That isn’t good for Corbyn, is it?
Wait! We haven’t factored in the non-voters. They weren’t just idle or uninterested in May, they felt disillusioned with politics and disengaged from it. A new broom could sweep them out of their houses and into the polling stations, determined to be citizens of a Labour-led country. Gawd Bless ’em. How many of them to we need to make Corbyn Prime Minister?
For an absolute Labour majority we need a whisker shy of 37% of them, or 5,761,000-ish people.across the country.
Perhaps two minibuses will be required.
Let’s lower our sights a bit. The SNP have a big block of seats in the house and claim to be anti-austerity and progressive. How many former non-voters would we have to coax out to form a majority coalition government with them?
Ah, that’s much better – now we only need 20% of the non-voters to (a) turn out and (b) vote Labour. That’s 3.1m people, so we’re probably still going to need that 2nd minibus, but it’s 2.6 million people fewer to be awoken from their political slumber.
Amusingly, depending on how far Tories get with EVEL reform in this parliament, those 3.1 million votes could lead to the unusual situation where a Labour/SNP coalition is in power, but Labour number 25 fewer English MPs than the Conservatives, making them unable to get through legislation affecting only England.
It would be a cruel irony if, against massive odds, left-wing Labour drew in over 3 million non-voters (the defining feature of whom is that they don’t vote) only to then be unable to run the country for them.
What I haven’t done in all of this is consider how the Conservative vote might change. The EU referendum next year should cut UKIP’s legs out from under them, securing the Tory’s right flank. Then there’s Osborne’s budget; the parts of that about raising minimum wage and chasing corporate and non-dom tax avoiders were him setting up his pitch for what, at the time, he probably expected to be a battle for the political centre-ground against Burnham or Cooper. How delighted he must have been to discover he wasn’t going to have to fight for that space at all, just shoo off the Lib Dem party, who really would fit in a mini-bus.
So Labour’s best hope is that between now and 2020 the SNP run Scotland so badly that the nationalists return to Labour and, simultaneously there’s a huge crash that Osborne can’t blame on Labour and which ruins the Conservative’s economic credibility. If those things happen then Jeremy Corbyn can take his place as head of a shattered, divided and ruined country and, by god, he’d better know a man who can work a spreadsheet.

If one could mine stupidity like gold then the Internet would make 19th century Klondike look like Hull on a wet Wednesday, but a few precious rocks of pure stupidium would shine still amongst the everyday nuggets of people who can fix the world’s problems yet have trouble with the complex differences between “their”, “there” and “they’re”.
One such gem was discovered this week in a Bruce Anderson article for CapX. The article argues that socialism is evil and that only a society based on market forces can work. Actually, it doesn’t argue that at all; it certainly says that, over and over, and has a big picture of Margaret Thatcher, but as it fails to advance any evidence to support this and doesn’t consider any of the possible counter-examples it can hardly be said to argue it.
This is already beyond run-of-the-mill stupidity, because we have an author who is daft enough to lay out an unsupported and evidentially wrong position, yet educated enough to write in a fashion that almost completely obfuscates their lack of arguments. But then, in the 2nd half of the 4th paragraph the article holds its nose and plunges to a new nadir of stupidity…
But revolutionary socialism is a battle to transform human nature. It seeks to remove the protection of civil society, personal freedom and the rule of law – all of which serve to insulate man from his worst instincts and attributes. Socialism denies original sin, and in so doing proves that it is still a crucial insight into the human condition.
Given the last sentence of that one would reasonably expect Mr Anderson to devote a paragraph or two to explaining what he’s talking about, but in fact he moves smoothly on to quoting Wordsworth and explaining that his argument isn’t theoretical, leaving his readers to wonder why it suddenly became theological.
In case you’re not au fait with the concept of original sin it all began with Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. We’re all familiar with the basics of the story; God tells Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit that will give them knowledge of good and evil, but the serpent talks Eve into having a nibble and giving some to Adam. God, worried that his creation has taken the first step towards godhood and will go on to eat the fruit that gives them eternal life, curses the legs off the snake, sentences Eve to terrible pain in childbirth, Adam to having to toil in the fields for his food and then makes them a set of clothes and kicks them out of paradise.
The story was originally part of the Jewish creation tale – the book of Genesis, where it appears, and the following 4 books of the Old Testament form the Torah, which pre-dates Christianity by centuries – and to them it was both explanatory and cautionary. It explained why the world was imperfect and why life was hard, because they’d been expelled from paradise, and it provided a salutary lesson not to disobey God, because he can really carry a grudge.
Early Christians added a few twists of their own to the story. Eve’s crime, they said, had been so great that it had introduced death into the world (this is directly contrary to what the biblical text says) and the taint of it passed to all of her descendants (i.e. everyone), so that every human born arrived fresh in the world already scarred by her transgression against God. Baptism became the symbolic washing away of this original sin
To what then is Mr Anderson referring when he says that “Socialism denies original sin”?
As the original sin, which is never referred to as a sin in Genesis, was defying God’s will then the plain reading of his statement is that to engage in wealth redistribution is to attempt to thwart God’s decision about who should be rich and who should be poor. This is a view that sits poorly with modern sensibilities, and when I say “modern” I mean “post-feudalism”.
While it is the view that, in a milder form, is inherent in support for a hereditary monarchy it is hard to reconcile with, say, effective medical practice. If God chooses who rules and who is wealthy then why thwart his will about who lives and who dies?
The truth is that in the UK we’re surrounded by socialist institutions that are world-class (the BBC, say), that we’re fiercely proud of (our public libraries, for example) or both (such as the NHS). Some socialised forces are so entrenched that we struggle to imagine how they’d work in the hands of market forces; the country is no longer protected by local lords raising their own army and hiring it to the king, the whole criminal justice system, from police to prison, works without having to swipe your credit card en route. The view that redistributing money to those who need it is them literally taking something which isn’t theirs to have is repugnant.
There is however an alternative reading for which I have to return to a question I conveniently skipped in the previous section…why Christians created the doctrine of original sin.

Listerine was the first over-the-counter mouthwash and by the 1920s, after 30-odd years of being on sale, it generated income of around $115,000 dollars annually. A tidy sum for the day, but hardly a product to set the world alight. Then, in a move widely regarded as marketing genius, the company took the term ‘chronic halitosis’ – obscure medical jargon for bad breath – and told the world they suffered from it, and that Listerine was the only cure.
In less than a decade annual sales were up to $8 million as people flocked to buy the solution to a problem they hadn’t known they had a few years earlier. A corporate turn around to warm the coldest of capitalist hearts, for sure, but the early Christian church beat them to it by more than 17 centuries.
Unlike the Judaic religion from which it sprang the Christian church was an organisation with a product to sell. It had strongly defined concepts of heaven and hell. The dogma of life everlasting was at its very core, its number one product. Critically original sin meant that the intercession of the church was necessary. One couldn’t simply live a blameless and sin-free life outside of the church, the weight of original sin would drag you down to hell.
Original sin was Christianity’s chronic halitosis, which is appropriate because it stinks. Imagine the thousands of mothers across two millennia who must have believed that their infant child would never gain eternal life because they’d died before they could be baptised. It centred the church entirely around guilt, making it the foundation of their rituals; confessing of sins, real or imagined, last rites, the Pope selling indulgences, literally passes into heaven, to those who worried their worldly wealth might be a barrier to salvation. Original sin also served as a constant reminder that the fall was Eve’s fault. Adam’s sin wasn’t so much the eating of the fruit, but rather taking advice from a woman, so it’s hardly surprising that Christianity has dragged centuries behind the rest of the world in gender equality.
Irrespective of this collateral damage the marketing move worked. Christianity has grown from a small Jewish sect to a major religion with billions of followers worldwide. The lesson to take away is the market forces work brilliantly when solving problems that we don’t have. If your car isn’t fast enough, your TV is big enough or your smart-phone isn’t as good as the competitor model then market forces will rush to your aid. Socialism instead focuses on solving the problems that are real, because there are enough of them without imaging new ones.
If socialism denies original sin then it does so because that is exactly the right response to a problem that isn’t real, and that’s the crucial insight into the human condition.
Thought it’s not, I feel, what Mr Anderson intended to say.